Rtavan AI LLC
North Carolina, United States · SOSID 3388209
Rtavan AI builds GovernanceHub: a registry that reads what AI vendors publish about governing their systems and scores it against a published method, and a policy router that turns an organisation’s own AI policy into a tamper-evident record. Nobody we assess pays us for anything.
A model card or a safety page is not evidence a client can rely on until someone has read it, scored what it actually says, and kept a dated copy of it. A tenant turns that reading — and your client’s own AI-use policy — into a record with a source and a hash behind every line.
A console tenant of your own — policies, keys, users, $500 a month. The router, applying a client’s policy and writing a hash-chained decision log. Examination packs built for a client’s committee or examiner. The document corpus, fetched and hashed daily, with a source and a date on every claim.
Production traffic: nobody has put live traffic through the router yet. Named vendor findings: withheld until media liability cover is bound. The comparative benchmark: it needs five engagements and there are none. A support desk: support is founder-led.
Walk through the demo → · See the full price and what it does not include →
Figures are read live from the registry each time this page loads.
Model cards, safety frameworks, evaluation reports: the documents a vendor publishes, scored for what is actually there against a seven-dimension evidence scale.
An endpoint an organisation points its AI traffic at. It applies that organisation’s own policy before any model is called and records each decision in a hash-chained log.
Bias auditors, AI governance consultancies and risk advisers who need a dated, sourced, independent view of the AI vendors their clients rely on.
Procurement, risk and compliance teams comparing what vendors actually disclose, before a contract rather than after an incident.
Academics, journalists and public bodies who need a citable, re-derivable record of what was published, and when.
Each control is cited to its source text. The mapping is a starting point for an assessment, not a certification, and a law not yet in force is marked as such.
No assessed party pays for anything: not for a score, not for early sight of a finding, not for a right of reply. Where a relationship exists between the assessor and an assessed party, it is recorded on the assessment itself and the independence claim is withdrawn, automatically.
Findings attached to a specific company are shown to clients under engagement rather than published openly. That is a decision about liability cover, not about the findings: media liability cover is not yet bound.
Rtavan — from the Vedic ṛtāvan, one that keeps to ṛta, the order things are meant to hold true to. Said “rih-TAH-van”.
© 2026 Rtavan AI LLC.